Follow the robust process of IT Assessment and Architecture design adopted by CSE
We have a unique (building code experience as ICC Accredited and County-approved Peer Reviewers in Fairfax and Prince George’s County, allowing us (ADCS) to thoroughly address building code issues early in the architectural design process before they become a problem once they are submitted to the local jurisdictions for Permit Review. Since they receive fewer permit comments, if any, and thus need fewer design changes than is usually required, ADCS can expedite County approvals on its Permit Drawing request.
We have a unique (building code experience as Accredited and County-approved Peer Reviewers in Fairfax and Prince George’s County, allowing us (ADCS) to thoroughly address building code issues early in the architectural design process before they become a problem when they are submitted to the local jurisdictions for Permit Review. Since they receive fewer permit comments, if any, and thus need fewer design changes than is usually required, ADCS can expedite County permits on its Permit Drawing request.
Establish a whole new “Research & Development” division first. Then, to put the new ideas to the test, do different projects. Do not refactor the code of your current test system until you are confident which alternative is the best for your situation. It is better to incorporate a limited collection of similar assessments to analyze and measure various ideas effectively. Make separate files for each concept. For each design, pick a small collection of similar tests to implement.
How do you anticipate the evaluation to be correct if the assessments you make are all different? We usually don’t refactor all of our experiments at once because it takes a lot of time which we don’t have. In any case, the device can work for an infinite number of tests. Make a presentation to your team about the concept. To evaluate the various solutions, use the given eight-level evaluation method. Since some of the points are subjective, it is best if a couple of people participate in the process (like what readable test is or which design is easier to learn).
Establish a final critical care session with the entire team, and based on the evaluation results, determine which idea to execute. I’ll clarify what each criterion means before moving on to the examples of how we use the method.